Gemini 4 Argon scores swing wildly across CLI harnesses

New Bug Hunt Bench results show Gemini 4 Argon’s score jumps depending on the CLI harness used. Paweł Huryn reports 40.7/105 via Antigravity CLI versus 33/105 via Gemini CLI, alongside big differences in runtime and cost.

Gemini 4 Argon scores swing wildly across CLI harnesses

TL;DR

  • Harness-dependent scores: Gemini 4 Argon scored 40.7/105 (Antigravity CLI) vs 33/105 (Gemini CLI) on Bug Hunt Bench
  • Bug Hunt Bench scope: 105 planted bugs across two repos; unplanted bugs tracked separately and excluded from main score
  • Leaderboard (Oct 14, 2026): GPT-6 Astra 45, Fable 5.1 43, Opus 5.5 max 41.7, Argon 40.7
  • Cost/runtime differences: Antigravity 56.5 min, $7.16 vs Gemini CLI 85.1 min, $32.08 (list-rate estimates)
  • Run conditions: Isolated folders, empty sessions, simple prompts; some harnesses share only the system prompt
  • Uncertainty context: Outcome verified with three runs; benchmark historical uncertainty estimated at ~2–3 points

Gemini 4 Argon’s score on the Bug Hunt Bench changed substantially depending on the CLI harness used, according to benchmark results posted by Paweł Huryn on October 14, 2026. Through Antigravity CLI, Argon scored 40.7 out of 105 planted bugs—just 0.7 points behind Opus 5.5 in its max configuration. The same model scored 33 through Gemini CLI.

Harness choice changed the ranking

Bug Hunt Bench tests models against 105 bugs planted across two repositories. The benchmark focuses on issues that frontier models reportedly missed during the first quarter of 2026. Unplanted bugs are tracked separately and do not affect the main score.

The leaderboard, updated October 14, lists the following results:

ModelConfigurationScore
GPT-6 Astramax45/105
Fable 5.1max43/105
Gemini 4 ArgonAntigravity CLI40.7/105
Opus 5.5max41.7/105
Opus 5.5xhigh36/105
Muse Spark 1.3max32.2/105
Gemini 4 ArgonGemini CLI33/105
Grok 4.7xhigh29/105
Gemini 3.8 FlashAntigravity CLI18/105

The leaderboard’s ordering places Opus 5.5 slightly ahead of Argon when both use their highest listed configurations. Huryn described the Antigravity result as moving Argon from “good” to a frontier model, while also noting that the benchmark was run three times to verify the outcome.

Different costs and runtimes

The benchmark records an estimated runtime of 56.5 minutes and a listed cost of $7.16 for Argon through Antigravity CLI. Through Gemini CLI, the estimated runtime rises to 85.1 minutes, with a listed cost of $32.08.

Huryn separately reported costs of $5.74, $6.43 and $9.30 for three Antigravity CLI runs. The benchmark’s displayed prices are list-rate estimates unless otherwise noted, so those figures do not necessarily match every individual run.

According to Huryn, the lower Antigravity costs came from fewer tokens and more cache hits. The test runs used isolated folders, empty sessions and simple prompts. Depending on the harness implementation, runs could share only the system prompt.

Argon was initially unavailable in Antigravity CLI, Huryn mentions, so the first attempt used a workaround. Gemini 3.8 Flash was tested through Antigravity CLI during that initial attempt.

The results suggest that the interface and harness can materially affect model benchmark outcomes. They do not establish that Argon’s underlying capabilities changed between tests, and the benchmark’s own historical uncertainty was described by Huryn as roughly two to three points.

Benchmark data is available on GitHub through the benchmark website.

Source: Paweł Huryn on X

Continue the conversation on Slack

Did this article spark your interest? Join our community of experts and enthusiasts to dive deeper, ask questions, and share your ideas.

Join our community