Claude launches Opus 5.5 with faster output, lower pricing

Claude has just rolled out Opus 5.5, bringing claimed gains in agentic coding, computer use, and knowledge work—while cutting run costs about 40% versus Opus 5. The model is also said to be 30% faster, with updated writing behavior and reduced token pricing.

claude cover

TL;DR

  • Claude Opus 5.5 launched: First Claude 5.5 model; claimed near Fable 5.1 performance, 40% cheaper than Opus 5
  • Performance focus: Improvements in agentic coding, computer use, and knowledge work; benchmarks often use maximum-effort adaptive thinking
  • Benchmarks reported: Terminal-Bench 66.4%, FrontierCode 54.4%, CursorBench 57.8%, AutomationBench 40.0%, HLE+tools 67.7%
  • Additional scores: OSWorld 2.0 81.8% (partial credit); Chartography 89% with tools
  • Speed and style: Claimed 30%+ faster than Opus 5; prioritizes key information, better adherence to writing rules
  • Pricing and limits: $4/M input, $20/M output; cache read $0.20/M, write $5/M; higher 5-hour limits, savable rate-limit reset

Claude has announced Claude Opus 5.5, the first model in its Claude 5.5 family. The company claims it performs at roughly the level of Claude Fable 5.1 for most tasks while costing 40% less to run than Opus 5.

Claude positions Opus 5.5 as an improvement over Opus 5 in agentic coding, computer use and knowledge work. Its published benchmarks show gains across several tests, although most results use adaptive thinking at maximum effort and should be read in that context.

BenchmarkOpus 5.5Opus 5Fable 5.1
Terminal-Bench 4.066.4%52.3%55.8%
FrontierCode v1.1 Main54.4%48.0%50.3%
CursorBench 4.057.8%46.6%51.8%
GDPval-AA v2.11,8461,7081,735
AutomationBench40.0%26.9%31.4%
Humanity’s Last Exam with tools67.7%63.6%65.6%

Opus 5.5 also scored 81.8% on OSWorld 2.0 with partial computer-use credit, compared with 80.7% for Fable 5.1 and 74.0% for Opus 5. On Chartography’s visual chart-recognition test with tools, it reached 89%, narrowly above Fable 5.1’s 88.4%.

The comparisons are not uniform. GPT-6 Astra scored higher on AutomationBench, at 41.4%, and Terminal-Bench-Science, at 64.6%, while Opus 5.5 reached 40% and 58.7% respectively. Claude’s benchmark notes also indicate that Opus 5.5 was evaluated with production safeguards enabled, and that the Terminal-Bench results use high-effort settings.

Claude claims the new model generates output more than 30% faster than Opus 5. The company also describes changes to its communication style, including putting important information first and following user-provided writing rules more consistently.

Pricing is lower across each listed token category. Opus 5.5 costs $4 per million input tokens and $20 per million output tokens, compared with $5 and $25 for Opus 5. Cache reads cost $0.20 per million tokens, down from $0.50, while cache writes cost $5 per million tokens, compared with $6.25.

Claude states that Opus 5.5 underwent external evaluation before release, including assessments by METR and Frontier Design. The company also claims the model achieved its strongest score so far on its most comprehensive alignment test, without providing a score in the announcement.

Alongside the model launch, Claude is increasing five-hour usage limits for Pro, Max and Team plans. Subscription users will also receive a rate-limit reset that can be saved for later use.

Source: Claude on X

Continue the conversation on Slack

Did this article spark your interest? Join our community of experts and enthusiasts to dive deeper, ask questions, and share your ideas.

Join our community