OpenAI launches GPT-6 Sol and Luna with cheaper API pricing

OpenAI has just rolled out GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, positioning them as faster, lower-cost GPT-6 options for large-scale workloads. The company says API pricing is 50% lower than GPT-5.6 promos, with higher limits and wider availability across ChatGPT and Codex.

openai cover

TL;DR

  • OpenAI introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, positioned as faster, lower-cost options for large-scale work
  • Built on GPT-6 Astra advances, including more efficient caching and inference
  • API pricing: 50% lower than GPT-5.6 promotional pricing; higher usage limits emphasized
  • Availability: API; rolling out in ChatGPT Work and Codex for Plus/Pro/Business/Enterprise/Edu
  • Free and Go users can try GPT-6 Luna in the desktop app
  • Alignment claims: lower coding-deception rates vs GPT-5.6; Astra listed lowest in comparisons

OpenAI has introduced GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna, two additions to its GPT-6 family that the company positions as faster, lower-cost options for large-scale work. The models build on advances behind GPT-6 Astra, including what OpenAI describes as more efficient caching and inference.

Lower API prices

OpenAI claims GPT-6 Sol and Luna have API prices 50% lower than GPT-5.6 promotional pricing. The company also promotes higher usage limits, suggesting the models are intended to support more iteration at reduced cost.

Both models are available through the API. GPT-6 Sol and Luna are rolling out in ChatGPT Work and Codex for Plus, Pro, Business, Enterprise, and Edu users. Free and Go users can try GPT-6 Luna in the desktop app.

Alignment claims

OpenAI also connects the new models to GPT-6 Astra’s alignment work, claiming that Sol and Luna improve on their GPT-5.6 counterparts.

The accompanying comparison materials list coding-deception rates of 1.3% for GPT-6 Sol and 2.8% for GPT-6 Luna, compared with 10.4% for GPT-5.6 Sol and 9.5% for GPT-5.6 Luna. GPT-6 Astra is listed at 0.5%. The chart labels lower rates as better, though the figures represent OpenAI’s stated evaluation results rather than an independent assessment.

Another AutomationBench comparison places GPT-6 Astra, GPT-6 Sol, GPT-5.6 Sol, GPT-6 Luna, GPT-5.6 Luna, Claude Opus 5, and Claude Fable 5.1 with Opus 5 fallback on a chart measuring score and cost per task. The chart uses score values from 0% to 50% and costs ranging from $0.005 to $5 per task.

Sol in ChatGPT

One accompanying ChatGPT interface identifies a model as “GPT-6 Sol Medium.” In an example involving a car wash 50 meters away, the model responds that driving is necessary because the car must be present for washing.

The launch materials also include a meme contrasting “GPT 6 SOL” with an attempt to remain loyal to “OPUS 5.5,” reflecting the familiar model-choice discussion around the release. OpenAI’s announcement, however, centers on cost, throughput, availability, and its claimed alignment improvements rather than a single benchmark result.

Source: OpenAI on X

Continue the conversation on Slack

Did this article spark your interest? Join our community of experts and enthusiasts to dive deeper, ask questions, and share your ideas.

Join our community